Open Tech Support
Open 

Tech Support Community
Back to HomeCommunityReviewsGuidesDownloadsLinkageMarketplaceContact Us

 »  Forum Navigation

Home
Post a Question
About Our Site
Support Our Site

What is this site?
Who are we?

Tolitz.Com - The Cynic Eye of the Third World Guy

Enhanced with Snapshots

 

 »  Advertisement


Go Back   Open Tech Support Community > NEWS FORUMS > General News




Comment

 

LinkBack Article Tools
AMD's Thoroughbred
Published by TotalRecall
04-02-2002
AMD's Thoroughbred

x-bit news has some information on AMD's new Thoroughbred Athlon XP processors. The story is reporting that AMD's new chips will indeed be compatible with the older Socket A boards, frequencies, and caches. Here's a snip from the article:

So, the CPUs based on the new 0.13micron core will be fully compatible with the current Socket A mainboards. The only thing they may require to be fully compatible with the old mainboards is a BIOS update so that the processors could be properly recognized. The processors themselves however, will be not any different in architecture from Palomino based ones. AMD has once again proven that the L2 cache of Thoroughbred will remain equal to 256KB and the processor bus frequency will stay by 266MHz. This way, migration to a new core will ensure higher working frequencies and lower production costs of Athlon XP processors.

As the performances of Palomino and Thoroughbred working at the same clock frequencies are equal, AMD decided to keep calling the new 0.13micron processors Athlon XP and to continue marking them with the rating calculated using the same formula.


The first launch is expected in late June with an Athlon XP 2400+ running at 1.933GHz. Speaking of rating systems, HardOCP has grabbed some of Intel's latest documents criticizing AMD's system. View them here. Check out x-bit's news here.

Article Tools


Search on Newegg.Com



  #1 (permalink)  
By SKYHN on 04-02-2002, 10:27 PM
Its too bad that Intel's propaganda is believed by so many people as well as companies. Its almost funny when I look at that to see something that just plain lies straight to your face.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By JANNA on 04-03-2002, 09:21 AM
how is it propoganda?? i use intel at work because i cannot afford server downtime. i cant afford to have the server offline constantly or lockups and issues with drivers. at home i use intel because i do not enjoy spending my time looking for the latest bios fix and wondering how long my comp will stay running without blue screening or tossing a driver conflict error. yes i have used AMD in the past. and yes i have tried AMD in a work environment and i have been less than pleased with its performance in anything other than artificial benchmarks. local comp shop tried to get me to switch to buying AMD and even offered to set up a demo machine and run some of our apps on it for a week. took him all day to set it up and it would not continually function thru the course of a single workday. the few crappy emachines i have work better. it isnt the intel hype i cant believe that people hold faith to....

so ill take intel until they stop producing reliable components. only hype i see about intel is the negative hype folks give
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By Outlaw on 04-03-2002, 10:24 AM
There's nothing wrong with Intel but saying AMD's are always having trouble with drivers/instability is exaggerated too, most AMD's work fine with the bios and drivers that come with it, it just works even better with the newest drivers but that's probably the same with Intel too.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By Null Actor on 04-03-2002, 10:56 AM
Janna, I should send you my work computer if it's so great.

It's a P4 1.6 ghz on an intel motherboard, with 768 megs of PC800 RDRAM, and all name brand components.

I get a lock up or blue screen every week or two, and this thing regularly corrupts memory. I'm be programming away, and my file will just randomly turn to gibberish.

If that's quality, I'll stick to my home athlon, which is 100% stable. The only time my computer at home is off, is when I'm putting in new hardware, and the only time I reboot, is when I change video drivers.

Not to mention my 1.4 athlon is noticeably faster in everything I do.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By TotalRecall on 04-03-2002, 12:21 PM
That article had nothing to do with stability, Janna.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By JANNA on 04-03-2002, 01:00 PM
i put nothing inot articles for benchmarks since those are artificially written proggies that usually favour one design over another. back when AMD was first marketing K6 chips they would often run the exact same types of articles that intel is now claiming it is intel propoganda against them. back then the benchmark proggies were written to favour intel based chips. now its just the opposite.

as for reliabilty of AMD versus Intel just go take a look at the hardware forum its nothing but people having one problem after another with drivers/bios/motherboard issues 90% of it AMD related
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
By Outlaw on 04-03-2002, 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by JANNA
as for reliabilty of AMD versus Intel just go take a look at the hardware forum its nothing but people having one problem after another with drivers/bios/motherboard issues 90% of it AMD related
Shall we do a poll on how many AMD and how many Intel users we have here?
That would probably explain the 90%/10% thing.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
By Spork Lover on 04-03-2002, 07:53 PM
I use both intel and amd.... my p4 system is great.. just had one bit of problem( a $400 problem!)... but she is running great now.

I like AMD just cause they are cheaper.. and they have great performance.

And If you wanna trade your good running work computers for my p4 1.8ghz peices of crap which are slower than the pIII 1.0ghz I had...then lets make the trad... these intels I use are total junk here.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
By SKYHN on 04-03-2002, 08:10 PM
And AMD Duron 1.3ghz outperforms my P4 1.3ghz. That is sad, I feel ashamed to own a P4.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks

Article Tools


Similar Threads

Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
AMD's Athlon XP 3200+ TotalRecall General News 0 05-13-2003 05:55 PM
AMD's 2700+ with 333 FSB Reviewed TotalRecall General News 0 11-07-2002 05:31 PM
News on AMD's New chip? Bobaroo Hardware 5 08-14-2002 04:50 PM
AMD's Hammer: Much Tweaking Needed TotalRecall General News 1 06-03-2002 07:31 PM
Sun To Use AMD's Opteron TotalRecall General News 5 05-10-2002 05:33 AM







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2. Copyright © 2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2

Article powered by GARS 2.1.9 ©2005-2006
Copyright 2000-2008 Open Tech Support.  All Rights Reserved.  Site Design and Development by Tolitz Rosel.