|
|
 |
|
|
Pages: 1
CSS Question
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)
Posted by: DemonBob
Seeing as I do not know everything about HTML or CSS I need a lil help. With my page.
I need way to make all the links on the left side a stay a light color and all the ones on the right a darker so it don't blend in with the light b/g. Is thier a way to do this? Or could you suggest a good color scheme that would work better?
here's the link: http://newconclave.virtualave.net/s...load/index.html
Thanks in Advance
------------------
"In every man there is evil. But the question is what is true evil?"
- @DemonBob@ the original Malo hombre
http://clannewconclave.cjb.net
http://systemoverload.cjb.net
<FONT COLOR="#FF0000" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by DemonBob on January 19, 2001 @ 03:16 PM]</font>
Posted by: Scav
Im not exactly sure how css works with it (kinda learning it so not all ontop of it) but i think if you remove the a:link {bleh} and just changed the color of the individual links you would get yer desired effect and have the other stuff still come intoplay when its, its turn. So like just remove that line and have all yer links go (a href="bleh.htm")(font color="whatever color you want for each link")Link Name(/font)(/a) removing all the ()'s and replacing em with the less than or greater than sign you normaly use. Get what im saying, cause i aint even sure hehe?
Also i know with css its possible to assign all sorts of screwy properties to things, theres a way to just call certain css into certain parts (i think its the span command but im not sure) and that way you could have yer normal css like it is for the sidebar and just call in the specific css for the links in the content side. (i dont know how so someone else will have to tell you or you can research it yerself, personaly id just do my first idea)
Posted by: DemonBob
Thanks Scav http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif What you just suggested was what i was planning to do as a last resort. But it seems that I am going to have to resot to that. http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif
THanks agian
------------------
"In every man there is evil. But the question is what is true evil?"
- @DemonBob@ the original Malo hombre
http://clannewconclave.cjb.net
http://systemoverload.cjb.net
Posted by: Kerash
First, In all your Links, ( On the Right Side ) Set up like:
<a class="Right" href="Bleh.Goober">Bleh</a>
Then on the Left side as shown bellow:
<a class="Left" href="Blah.Goober">Bleh</a>
Now the Cascading Style Sheets you would use as shown bellow:
A.Right:link {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Right:visited {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Right:active {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Right:hover {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Left:link {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Left:visited {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Left:active {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
A.Left:hover {color:# ; text-decoration:Bold;}
Note: Above the Cascading Style Sheet you would supply: ' <style type="text/css"> '
and at the end supply: ' </style> '
Last Note: A good trick, to hide the Cascading Style Sheets from old, Less developed browsers, Would be to Supply: ' <!-- ' Under ' <style type="Text/css"> ' , and Above ' <style> ' simply Supply: ' --> '
P.S: I told you, on your page that i loved the way it looked, and that you could come to me for help with ANYTHING related to Web Development, hehehehe!
Have Fun!
------------------
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly
Posted by: Kerash
Scav supplied a legendary method, Though that would also Disable any further color features to the link.
( I.E: If you wished to have an OnMouseOver effect, The ' <font color> ' Would dissable it. )
P.S: Scav, your secksy
* Winks *
------------------
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly
Posted by: Scav
Hmm interesting method of doing stuff. Right now on my page rather then do <span id="bleh"> wherever I wanted the text to be changed i simply put <font>message</font> and have the font css changed around. now if i can do stuff like font.small or font.blue it could be interesting... I'll have to look into that... do you know if thats supported on both ie and netscape and how far back version wise it goes?
Posted by: Kerash
Internet Explorer, Version 5.01 to 5.5.01
Netscape is a joke, it doesn't support anything, it's a disgrace of an application, it's buggy, it's riddled with security holes, hell i could get r00t, with a single script.
man, i wouldn't even give netscape to a bum.
Thats gotta be the worste application i've seen, you install it you find out how much of a joke it is, then when you unistall it and you find out you can't veiw images, you can't veiw htm, or html documents, without editing Registry key after Registry key setting up the Extensions to what they used to be.
Man, if i ever met that loser that thought up netscape i'd kick the living **** out of him, and then piss in his eye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------------
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly
Posted by: Scav
 Quote:
Originally posted by Kerash:
Netscape is a joke, it doesn't support anything, it's a disgrace of an application, it's buggy, it's riddled with security holes, hell i could get r00t, with a single script
|
Didn't wanna repost yer whole message but im guessing it don't work on netscape? heheh well then thats out. http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/frown.gif
Posted by: Kerash
Nope. Netscape 6.01 ( The newest version. ) Doesn't support CSS, or any DHTML, other than the: ' <Layer> ' Tags.
But you can get a copy of Internet Explorer 5.5.01 Service pack and internet Tools Here This supports all area's of DHTML, CSS, and all the other browser features.
Also check here for a copy of MSN Explorer, It's powered by IE5.5, But with a new, and apealling look!
P.S: Why bother with netscape anyways? what exactly does it have that IE doesn't? beside the 30 thousand known security holes, and 4 billion exploitable and exploited bugs.
Is it the look? i'm aware Netscape has a new, and ' appealing ' look. But if you want Looks, than check out MSN Explorer........
It has looks, as well it still has the Browser capabilities...Just give it a day in court man, i know your not gonna be disapointed....Trust me.
------------------
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly
Posted by: Canis Lupus
It's always a good rule of thumb for any web designer to try and make his pages "look good" on as many different browser platforms as possible. A web designer's preference may be IE (I know mine is), but if you want the widest range of audience possible for your site, at least make it somewhat 'serviceable' in Netscape (and Opera, and Lynx, etc).
Of course, if you are only targetting one specific audience, then by all means design pages just for IE users. All I know is that Netscape users (like Nova) will never ever visit your page again, hehehehe http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/tongue.gif
------------------
Those who expect nothing will never be disappointed...
Posted by: Canis Lupus
Hehe, the headaches I have with with Netscape have to do with they way it handles tables and spacings.
For precise alignment and proper spacing, making it work for both IE and Netscape is a big pain in the arse. Netscape insists on adding a margin even if the margin has been set at 0. And the cellspacings and cellpaddings work differently in both of em. I'm telling ya, tables look very different in IE and Netscape.
And CSS has just been recently (and properly) supported by Netscape 6... Opera 5.0, surprisingly, has better CSS support than Netscape 5.4x. As for Lynx, well, I haven't tried it, and neither has 99% of the computing population, hehehe.
------------------
Those who expect nothing will never be disappointed...
Posted by: Scav
I didnt know there was a netscape 5 series? must not be called navigator in that. For my sites I create em on ie 5.5 and double check em everyonce in a while with netscape navigator 4.7 and then when im just about done i goto netscape 6... 6 is scarey... I also havent been able to download 6 since my last reformat cause it keeps giving errors while navigator 4.7 works fine. I think im gonna need to see about getting a series 4 version of ie to test my junk on cause i would like to make everything at least compatable through the 4's
Posted by: Kerash
Really? Then take a look see at: http://www.kerash.org/ With Netscape. ( Any version http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif ) And then Take a look at it with Internet Explorer ( Even the old 5.00, You'll see who's the dominating Browser! )
Netscape has never supported CSS, or the better portion of DHTML other than the lame ' <layer> ' Tags. And yes i have my friend rag on me about having a strict IE supported webpage, but that page is to give my props to Microsoft. ( http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/wink.gif )
Netscape had an excuse with the old 6.0 for not supporting DHTML or CSS, because those two browser features where extremely new, this 6.01 has been what? a YEAR in the making. And STILL isn't right, Browser-wise.
LoL and no offence, but my page has nothing for a netscape user http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif
------------------
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif
<FONT COLOR="#FF0000" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by Kerash on February 24, 2001 @ 01:13 AM]</font>
Posted by: Scav
heh i didnt say i was looking for something that resembled a kiddy chew toy http://www.opentechsupport.net/forums/smile.gif msn explorer looks stupid. I dont even program for those last two canis, I dont really have anyway to test them and they are only a really tiny percentage of the market anyway. But netscape and ie are a must you gotta have both. Its usualy pretty easy to get the same thing happen in both, netscape has a little different DOM but for the most part if you wrote the code right they will both read it very close to the same.
Posted by: Scav
the css
FONT.BLUE {blah blah blah}
FONT {blah blah blah}
works in netscape 4.7 i dont know how much farther back
Posted by: Kerash
Really? I was unaware.
Though, Netscape would be a decent browser if they'd just fix some of the critical Security holes, and added full DHTML support, But for some reasson they either don't care, or just don't want to.
------------esti--
Who am i? Anybody?
Exactly
|
|
|
|
|
